Search found 4 matches
- Fri Apr 07, 2023 7:04 am
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Support for COBOL
- Replies: 14
- Views: 37203
Re: Support for COBOL
After using EDP this morning, I realized that coloring the reserved words would not make any difference to its effectiveness.
- Fri Apr 07, 2023 6:10 am
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Support for COBOL
- Replies: 14
- Views: 37203
Re: Support for COBOL
Ok, thanks. I appreciate the quick response.
- Thu Apr 06, 2023 3:44 pm
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Support for COBOL
- Replies: 14
- Views: 37203
Re: Support for COBOL
I wasn't thinking of a parser, which would be difficult.
I was thinking of a simple match to a syntax file to color the keywords, like the way my text/programming editor does with the attached file.
Lol, after looking at this file, there are so many reserved words I don't know, much less used. I ...
I was thinking of a simple match to a syntax file to color the keywords, like the way my text/programming editor does with the attached file.
Lol, after looking at this file, there are so many reserved words I don't know, much less used. I ...
- Wed Apr 05, 2023 8:47 am
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Support for COBOL
- Replies: 14
- Views: 37203
Support for COBOL
For us dinosaurs, could you add support for COBOL?
I just upgraded to the latest version with the expectation that COBOL would be supported, as there continue to be billions of lines of code still in operation. (Yes, COBOL is verbose.)
Alternatively, where could I find information on creating a ...
I just upgraded to the latest version with the expectation that COBOL would be supported, as there continue to be billions of lines of code still in operation. (Yes, COBOL is verbose.)
Alternatively, where could I find information on creating a ...