Search found 114 matches
- Fri Mar 21, 2025 4:19 pm
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: BUG: ExamDiff improperly comparing shortcut (.lnk) files causes slowness
- Replies: 25
- Views: 59610
Re: BUG: ExamDiff improperly comparing shortcut (.lnk) files causes slowness
I'm not sure what problem has to be solved here. LNK files are just binary files, and they are compared as such. The target column is purely information (in case of LNK files), and it is hidden by default.
The original issue, again, will be resolved. We are not likely to have an option specific ...
- Fri Mar 21, 2025 3:21 pm
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: BUG: ExamDiff improperly comparing shortcut (.lnk) files causes slowness
- Replies: 25
- Views: 59610
Re: BUG: ExamDiff improperly comparing shortcut (.lnk) files causes slowness
Again, it simply, in case of shortcuts, imitates what the Explorer does. As for the performance, as i said earlier, it will not be an issue.
If I undrstand correctly that gives users a simple choice: don't display the target column (so be none the wiser about what EDP compared), or display it ...
- Fri Mar 21, 2025 2:35 pm
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: BUG: ExamDiff improperly comparing shortcut (.lnk) files causes slowness
- Replies: 25
- Views: 59610
Re: BUG: ExamDiff improperly comparing shortcut (.lnk) files causes slowness
The target value is used for display purposes (like the Windows Explorer's Link Target column.
Comparison is still performed on the actual links. The target is also used for navigation in case of symbolic links (reparse points).
But the thing is, the resolved target only shows a resolution by ...
- Fri Mar 21, 2025 1:09 am
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: BUG: ExamDiff improperly comparing shortcut (.lnk) files causes slowness
- Replies: 25
- Views: 59610
Re: BUG: ExamDiff improperly comparing shortcut (.lnk) files causes slowness
You are probably right. In any case, that's up to IShellLink, we can't control its behavior.
Surely though you could peek at each target string to see if it contains a percent sign, first? And then if it does determine from an option (does it already exist? - I couldn't find anything online for ...
- Wed Feb 26, 2025 10:18 am
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Problems of offset
- Replies: 20
- Views: 91459
Re: Problems of offset
You could also shrink unnecessarily long words.
Why "Offset:", bearing in mind that anyone using this sort of display will already know that Offset is the normal way to specify a location? Why not just use "At:"?
Why "Selection:" when what it seems to mean, is "Size:"? Or "Sz:" or even "L:" or "Q ...
Why "Offset:", bearing in mind that anyone using this sort of display will already know that Offset is the normal way to specify a location? Why not just use "At:"?
Why "Selection:" when what it seems to mean, is "Size:"? Or "Sz:" or even "L:" or "Q ...
- Thu Feb 06, 2025 3:19 am
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: ExamDiff with elevated rights possible again via right mouse key?
- Replies: 12
- Views: 65099
Re: ExamDiff with elevated rights possible again via right mouse key?
Why would one need this? - is it to read files that your user wouldn't otherwise be able to?
Presumably starting the compare via the right-click context menu only works (ever) if in Explorer/whatever you've had the rights to read the directory info of the parent directory?
Presumably starting the compare via the right-click context menu only works (ever) if in Explorer/whatever you've had the rights to read the directory info of the parent directory?
- Wed Mar 20, 2024 5:57 am
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Ignore large block of text
- Replies: 21
- Views: 106832
Re: Ignore large block of text
Perhaps another option would be to write a simple 'plugin' which strips out the blocks of lines
you're not interested in. Possibly you'd want the plugin to leave a single line where each such
block had been saying "There was a key definition here." or even (if the number of them
matters) "Key ...
you're not interested in. Possibly you'd want the plugin to leave a single line where each such
block had been saying "There was a key definition here." or even (if the number of them
matters) "Key ...
- Thu Apr 06, 2023 11:32 am
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Support for COBOL
- Replies: 14
- Views: 37184
Re: Support for COBOL
We don't use Guesslang via the plug-in architecture. Guessing is done on the text buffer; whether it was generated by a plug-in is irrelevant. Then there's mapping to EDP doc types, currently only system-defined. I can foresee mapping to a user-defined type but that language has to be supported by ...
- Thu Apr 06, 2023 10:39 am
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Support for COBOL
- Replies: 14
- Views: 37184
Re: Support for COBOL
As for user-defined parsers and language detectors, this is something we don't foresee in the immediate future.
When you say "user-defined parsers", do you mean loading Tree-sitter parsers /if/ someone had managed to create one themselves?
I'd have thought the effort involved in allowing users ...
- Thu Apr 06, 2023 10:04 am
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Support for COBOL
- Replies: 14
- Views: 37184
Re: Support for COBOL
Unfortunately, the syntax highlighting library we use does not support COBOL.
It's worse than that: it doesn't support lots of things. One might be inclined to ask why you chose it.
And, it looks like defining a parser for it, would be very hard work - suitable perhaps as an academic project ...
- Tue Mar 07, 2023 4:06 pm
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: EBCDIC is not being displayed correctly
- Replies: 22
- Views: 55002
Re: EBCDIC is not being displayed correctly
Thank-you!
- Fri Feb 24, 2023 1:54 pm
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: EBCDIC is not being displayed correctly
- Replies: 22
- Views: 55002
Re: EBCDIC is not being displayed correctly
Thanks. We were thinking about these code pages... Here's an idea: why should EBCDIC files treated as second-class citizens and compared as binary files? Or, for that matter, any other non-Unicode (ANSI) code pages? So one potential approach would be to have an option in EDP to define the default ...
- Fri Feb 24, 2023 1:22 pm
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: EBCDIC is not being displayed correctly
- Replies: 22
- Views: 55002
Re: EBCDIC is not being displayed correctly
... and (2) the existing EBCDIC support in binary comparison will go away, for obvious reasons.
It's not obvious to me. EBCDIC files are not all just text - yes those containing programme source (of one sort or another) are, but object code, load modules, snap dumps etc are not.
There's still ...
- Mon Jun 27, 2022 2:32 am
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Slippery directories
- Replies: 9
- Views: 22316
Re: Slippery directories
Does that depend on how the list is sorted?MSpagni wrote: Sat Jun 25, 2022 8:46 am Now, when a directory becomes empty after a deletion, the directory itlsef shifts at the bottom of the list.
- Tue Apr 12, 2022 6:21 am
- Forum: ExamDiff Pro
- Topic: Bug: Ignored lines by regex do not work always
- Replies: 17
- Views: 33138
Re: Bug: Ignored lines by regex do not work always
I'm unconvinced that the regexes are doing what you want. As far as I can see:
setting name='[^']*(icon|signedo|lasts|last_s|mute|photo)[^']*'
looks for
the literal "setting name='"
then zero or more instances of not-single-quote
then one of a set of literals
then zero of more instances ...
setting name='[^']*(icon|signedo|lasts|last_s|mute|photo)[^']*'
looks for
the literal "setting name='"
then zero or more instances of not-single-quote
then one of a set of literals
then zero of more instances ...